Disclaimer

Clause 1This is not legal advice

Nothing produced by this platform — not the analysis report, not an agent's stated position, not the statute mapping, not the risk band, not the transcript of a simulated hearing, and nothing on this website — constitutes legal advice.

Legal advice is the application of law to a client's circumstances by a qualified professional who has taken responsibility for it. That is what you do with the output. It is not what the output is.

Clause 2No advocate–client relationship

Using this platform does not create an advocate–client relationship, a solicitor–client relationship, or any professional relationship of a similar kind between you and us. We are a software provider. We do not represent you, we do not appear for you, and we owe you no professional duty of the sort your own counsel owes their clients.

Nor is any privilege created by us. Whether the material you upload attracts privilege in your jurisdiction, and whether uploading it to a third-party processor affects that privilege, is a question for you and your own advisers. We have set out in the security statement exactly how material is handled so that you can make that assessment on accurate facts.

Clause 3The analysis can be wrong

This platform is built on large language models. They are capable, and they are also capable of being confidently wrong. Specifically, and without limiting the general point:

• A citation may be inaccurate, or may refer to authority that does not exist. Every citation must be checked against the primary source.
• A date, figure or name may be misread from a scanned or handwritten document.
• A provision may be mapped to facts it does not in truth engage.
• A summary may omit something material without saying that it has.
• An agent may state a position more firmly than the record supports.

The workspace marks what it could not verify. It cannot mark an error it does not know it has made. That limitation is inherent to the technology and is not a defect we can engineer away.

Clause 4Your duty to verify

Every output must be reviewed by a qualified professional before it is relied upon, disclosed to a client, served on another party, or filed in any proceeding. That review is not a formality and cannot be delegated back to the platform.

Courts in several jurisdictions have sanctioned practitioners for filing material containing fabricated citations produced by AI tools. We mention it not to alarm you but because it is the precise risk this clause exists to prevent. Check the authorities.

Clause 5The argument is not a court

The argument is a rehearsal facility. The “bench” is a language model instructed to behave like one. Nothing that happens in it has any bearing on any real proceeding before any court, tribunal, commission or authority, and it carries no authority of any kind.

Both advocates and the bench are the same underlying model playing three parts. When the bench agrees with the advocate appearing for you, that is one system being consistent with itself — not a second opinion, and not corroboration, however much the layout may suggest otherwise.

A favourable rehearsal outcome is not an indication that you will succeed. An unfavourable one is not an indication that you will fail. It is a way of finding out which questions you have not yet answered.

Clause 6No affiliation with any authority

No judiciary, government department, police service, bar council, law society, tribunal, commission or regulator has endorsed, approved, certified, reviewed or is otherwise associated with this platform. Nothing on this website should be read as suggesting otherwise.

References to statutes, rules, courts and authorities are descriptive. They indicate what the platform can read and reason about. They do not indicate any relationship with the bodies named.

Clause 7The percentage is not a prediction

The platform produces a numerical estimate of prospects, expressed as a percentage. It is always accompanied by a band, a confidence level, the reasoning behind it, and a statement of what would move it. Those accompaniments are part of the output and must not be stripped from it.

The confidence level is computed from how much of the file was readable, whether the documents the matter turns on are present, and how many outstanding questions remain unanswered. Where confidence is low the figure is deliberately moved toward the middle of the range, and the interface says so.

It is not a prediction. It is an estimate of prospects on the documents supplied, produced by a language model that knows nothing outside those documents — not the bench, not the listing, not opposing counsel, not anything occurring after the last document was filed.

No figure produced by this platform should be presented to a client as a likelihood of success, or repeated as a number in its own right.

Clause 7ATranscribed scans may contain errors

Where a document has no machine-readable text — a scanned FIR, a photocopied charge sheet, a photograph of a page — its contents are transcribed by a language model reading images of the pages. This is accurate in the ordinary case and is not perfect.

A digit misread in an FIR number, a section number, a date or an amount changes the meaning of the document while leaving it entirely readable. Check every figure, section and date you intend to rely on against the original page.

Where the platform cannot read something it marks it as illegible rather than guessing, and where a batch of pages fails it records a visible gap in the transcript rather than joining the surrounding pages together. Neither safeguard can catch a character that was misread confidently.

Clause 8It works only from what you give it

The platform reasons from the documents lodged against the matter. It has no knowledge of anything that is not in the record: an oral instruction, a document you decided not to upload, a fact known to you but never written down, or a development after the last document was filed.

Where the record is incomplete, the analysis will say so. It will not fill the gap by inference, and you should not treat the absence of a finding as a finding of absence.

Clause 9Jurisdiction and currency of the law

Law differs by jurisdiction and changes over time. The platform's training data has a cut-off, and it has no reliable awareness of amendments, repeals or decisions after that point unless they appear in the documents you supply.

Nothing here should be assumed to reflect the law as it stands today in your forum. Verify the position against the current statute and the current authority before you rely on it.

Clause 10Your professional obligations

If you are a practising advocate, solicitor or other regulated professional, your obligations to your client, your court and your regulator are unaffected by using this platform. In particular you remain responsible for competence, for confidentiality, for the accuracy of what you file, and for any disclosure your regulator requires about the use of AI tools in preparing work.

We do not know your regulator's rules and we do not purport to advise you on them. Check them.

Clause 11Third-party material

The platform may surface, quote or link to statutes, judgments, rules and other material published by third parties. We do not warrant that such material is complete, current or accurately reproduced, and its inclusion is not an endorsement. Always work from the official published source.

Clause 11AUse is at your own risk

The platform is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis, and you use it at your own risk. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we give no warranty, condition or representation of any kind, whether express or implied, and in particular none as to accuracy, completeness, currency, fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability, or that the platform will be uninterrupted or free of error.

You are a qualified professional or are acting under the supervision of one. The decision to rely on anything produced here, in whole or in part, is yours alone. That includes the decision to cite an authority, to advance an argument, to advise a client on prospects, or to file anything. We are not your advocate, we do not know your matter, and we do not see what you do with the output.

We say plainly throughout that citations are unverified, that transcription of a scan can misread a figure, and that the percentage is an estimate on the papers supplied. Proceeding without checking those things is a choice, and its consequences are yours.

Nothing in this clause purports to exclude a liability that cannot lawfully be excluded — see clause 12, which sets out what survives and why.

Clause 12Limitation of liability

The limitations and exclusions of liability that apply to your use of this platform are set out in the terms of service and are incorporated into this disclaimer. In summary, and subject to what that document says in full, we are not liable for any loss arising from your reliance on an output that you did not verify, and nothing in these documents excludes liability that cannot lawfully be excluded.

ContactHow to reach us about this document

Questions about the limits of the platform, or about something it got wrong.

By email

legal@litoraai.com

By post

Rank First Technologies Private Limited (CIN U58201PB2026PTC068900)
F-542, Phase 8A, Sector 75, Mohali, Punjab 140308, India

Grievance Officer

Aman Bhatia — grievance@litoraai.com
Appointed under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.

This document is governed by the laws of India, and the courts referred to in the terms of service have exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute arising from it.